Raising The Mandatory Attendance Age To 18

By Monica Brady-Myerov (WBUR)

LISTEN NOW »

Get the Flash Player

In May, a legislative commission is expected to deliver its recommendations for ways to reduce the school dropout rate. The dropout rate has not improved for a decade. Each day in Massachusetts close to 100 students drop out of school. Gov. Patrick hopes to cut that figure by 25 percent within the next two years.

One measure being considered is raising the legal dropout age from 16 to 18. The idea may sound like a simple solution, but it has many critics.

This GED class in Haverhill is small. Eight students sit at long tables facing the white board. It allows instructor Jeff Reddy time to sit down with students individually. Some instruction begins with basic skills that are usually taught in middle school.

The General Educational Development, or GED, test was created in 1942 for World War II veterans who had not completed high school. But the profile of a GED student has changed since then. In this class, there are many 16 and 17 year olds. Nancy Tariot is in charge of the GED classes those kids attend. 

NANCY TARIOT: When they come in here with their backpacks on and they say they want their GED and I tell them, ‘You know what, this is an adult ed program and we’ll treat you like an adult, which means it’s up to you to do your homework and it’s up to you to study and we don’t do basketball and we don’t do proms.’

Tariot says she counsels young students against leaving school to enter a GED program.

TARIOT:  My personal feeling is they should increase the age at which children are allowed to drop out of school, because a 16 year old is not a good person to be making that kind of decision, but they do.

Raising the mandatory attendance age is expected to be one of the recommendations from the legislature’s dropout commission. There’s little political or research consensus on whether it works to lower the dropout rate.

Gov. Deval Patrick says he’d consider supporting keeping kids in school until they’re 18. State Rep. Marie St. Fleur, who is on the dropout commission, is in favor of raising the age. She says schools statewide lose 91 students a day.

MARIE ST. FLEUR: Maybe it quiets our classroom, but what happens to the lives of those people at the end of the day? And it’s not simply their lives we impact – they will have children — we impact the generations that come from them after that.

And St. Fleur says 16 year olds are not equipped to make a decision that will affect the rest of their lives. But by law, 16 year olds can dropout of school without undergoing an intervention or even getting a signature from a parent. Even a 14 year old can leave school with an employment waiver as long as they work at least six hours a day.  Schools are supposed to conduct exit interviews, but many don’t. 

VANESSA JOHNSON: Once I turned 16 I was like, ‘Finally I’m really not going to school now.’

Vanessa Johnson, who’s now 18, says she left because she was suspended twice and fell far behind her peers. Now, as the mother of a new baby, she wishes she had been forced to stay beyond 16 years old.

JOHNSON: I think they should change that you can drop out when you’re 16 because you’re not an adult yet — you shouldn’t be able to make your own choices whether you should be able to drop out or not at 16.

Supporters of increasing the mandatory attendance age point to a study which suggests that staying in school may also increase students earning potential. It was co-authored by Joshua Angrist, a labor economist at MIT who studies the economics of education. Angrist says when kids are forced to stay in school longer, it pays.

JOSHUA ANGRIST: Each year of schooling  raises your earnings about 10 percent, and that really adds up because if you think about somebody who goes to college and spends a couple years doing something else, they might have 40 years of working life, so that 10 percent higher earnings every year is millions and millions of dollars.

But some critics say the study is outdated because it used census data from decades ago. It might be more applicable to look at the dropout rate in the 19 states that have a compulsory age of 18. The Rennie Center for Education Research and Policy recently looked at those states. Researcher Lisa Famularo says  you would expect them to have lower dropout rates, but they don’t.

LISA FAMULARO: Of the states that have the lowest dropout rates, only five of them have a compulsory age of 18. 

Famularo says the proposal to raise the age in Massachusetts should get careful scrutiny in this difficult budget time.

FAMULARO: I would rather see the state spend its money on implementing programs to help support students, to better engage them in school, than spend money on enforcing a law which is going to throw them back into the environment that is not working for them.

And may not work for the whole classroom. The Massachusetts Teachers Association has not taken a position on the proposal. But many teachers oppose it, including Steven Berbeco, who teaches government and politics at Charlestown High School.

STEVEN BERBECO: You can’t legislate education, you can’t pass a law to make people learn more. Our communities will get better results out of building models that invite students to stay in the classroom rather than passing a law to lock them in the school.

Another teacher says you can use the law to keep a 17 year old in a classroom, but to keep the student focused and learning is a totally different proposition.

6 Responses to “Raising The Mandatory Attendance Age To 18”

  1. John Earl Says:

    Regarding raising the dropout age to 18—It would be nice to keep kids in school until they are 18–but it will do little if family, race, cultural and curriculum issues are not addressed. I am an intelligent individual that grew up dirt poor with little family support for doing well in school. I was an honor student in 7th and 8th grades–but went on to quit at 16. I was fortunate to live in a time where your intelligence and demeanor meant more than a HS diploma. One could join a trade union (if you were white) and become somewhat successful. Note–I was raised in Albany, NY — not Albany, GA. Only circumstance got me to seek a higher education–along with an intellect to overcome the circumstance.
    A child should be given the ability to express what interests them along with mandating communication skills, and the ability to understand the human condition which is sorely absent. Reading, writing, checkbook balancing (math will migrate to those interested) and a gradual mandatory review of the human condition from pre-birth to death every elementary and high school year of our lives. Parents, who for whatever reason(s), cannot provide needed support, should be afforded mentoring help or some other form of assistance or guidance.

    And lack of HS education should not prevent a smart, bored kid from enrolling in college (as long as he or she can pass an entrance exam. At 33 years old, with a 9th grade education, i got my GED (which was unnecessary) enrolled in a college, got my degree and pursued a successful career.

  2. Barbara Hemmings Gray Says:

    These students are telling the schools what they need and yet some of the adult panelists are saying well, it starts in the home W.ell so what!! ESL can be better implemented Study the research stop going along with the archaic thinkers and the English only loonies meet these kids where they are not where you want them to

    Retired foreignlanguage teacher

  3. Barbara Hemmings Gray Says:

    If you raise the age you better give the students something meaingful to do

  4. Barbara L. Thomson Says:

    Yes, I think the dropout age should be raised to 18 years of age. There was much discussion on the program this evening about decisions made, as to whether or not one should drop out. Get tough. Life is tough. You stay in school until you are 18 and if you don’t have your wits about you by that time, then it’s time to try some other avenue of lifestyle and earning a living. If you don’t graduate, good luck.

  5. Diana Calzada Mokler Says:

    I agree that the dropout age should be raised to age 18 years, We also believe that schools need to help students learn in many different ways for we have three children whom have not been allowed to receive an education. Their language base learning disabilities got in the way of how they interpreted information in the classroom. Public schools need to completely change how they teach all students. Our youngest has been diagnosed with , executive function disorder, Math (Dyscalculia),slow processing speed, written language disorder, all of which, for years has gotten in the way of her learning , causing her substantial learning skills and content area gaps

    She has had no education or tutoring since 10/15/08. Her school district has refused for years to accept the independent medical professionals recommendations, from as far back as the year 2000, 2007 & 2008 ,causing our child emotional sequelae of specific learning disorders.
    If a child does not have an appropriate and well written IEP plan that can sufficiently provide specific diagnosed parameters, of student’s identified learning disabilities and disorders, then , no matter how hard a child tries in school or no matter how well inattention a teacher can behave towards the child, the student will not be able to progress until schools can provide an educational prescription to adequately treat and remediate students deficits in a comprehensive manner to build students self esteem,therefore allowing student to progress in school and within her future goals and dreams.

  6. john Says:

    New Hampshire recently passed a plan last year to set high school to eventually end at 16, with students who seek additional preparation for college or remedial courses allowed to stay longer.

    This whole notion that the 4-year model of high school works is incredibly misguided. I “dropped out” when I was a junior, went part-time to a Top 40 school, and transferred full-time into the same class year graduates of my public high school who went to my university were in.

    The problem is high school is too long, and too irrelevant. Focus on replacing primary education with Montessori— not salvaging the least relevant period of any person’s life. This entire project on NPR is a misguided one, as it presupposes educational retainment is a problem.

Leave a Reply